
5 key points between the collaborative economy and the Uber Colombia S.A.S. case.
October 1, 2025
●
The Collaborative Economy, in its essence, represents a new approach to exchanging goods and services through information and communication technologies (ICT), playing a central role in the delivery of services via digital platforms. Among the best-known examples in this sector is carsharing, which allows the use of a vehicle on demand, with payment only for…
Artículos Relacionados
Soluciones Relacionadas
Equipo
The Collaborative Economy, in its essence, represents a new approach to exchanging goods and services through information and communication technologies (ICT), playing a central role in the delivery of services via digital platforms.
Among the best-known examples in this sector is carsharing, which allows the use of a vehicle on demand, with payment only for the time it is used. In this way, users save the costs associated with maintaining their own car, while also potentially having a positive impact on city traffic flow.
In Colombia, there is an ongoing debate on this matter between Uber Colombia S.A.S. and the taxi drivers’ union, a topic recently addressed by the Supreme Court of Justice in Ruling SC 370 of 2023.
This confrontation has not only raised questions about unfair competition but has also prompted a detailed analysis of legal and regulatory issues.
Here we present five key points that illustrate the relationship between the collaborative economy and this conflict:
- Collaborative economy and unfair competition: The collaborative economy allows individuals and companies to share resources, challenging traditional competition rules. This new approach has sparked debates about what constitutes unfair competition in a constantly evolving business world.
- Technological hyper-evolution: The ICT-driven “hyper-evolution” of new platforms and apps has rapidly transformed economic dynamics. Competition law has been affected by the accelerated development of these technologies and the emergence of new business models.
- Changing roles in the market: The collaborative economy has disrupted traditional roles in the marketplace. Examples like Uber show how individuals can be both consumers and service providers, challenging conventional market categories.
- Regulation and legal challenges: The speed of technological advances poses challenges for regulation. The response to the collaborative economy is not necessarily prohibition but rather addressing specific legal issues as they arise.
- Benefits of science and technology: Laws must strike a balance between regulation and the right of people to benefit from scientific and technological progress. International treaties uphold this right, highlighting that the collaborative economy is a natural manifestation of ongoing technological evolution and innovation.
In resolving the conflict between a taxi platform and Uber, the Court points to the challenges that collaborative economies pose for the justice system. See communication from the Supreme Court of Justice.
